The share of a reproduction paper is based on analyses of plus in insights into current methods and problems—plus the certainty that is added is sold with validating past outcomes.

The share of a reproduction paper is based on analyses of plus in insights into current methods and problems—plus the certainty that is added is sold with validating past outcomes.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: could be the paper well-structured and well-written?
  3. Data/code supply: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why it is not feasible?
  4. Analysis: In the event that paper surely could reproduce the outcomes of the previous work, does it demonstrably construct exactly what would have to be filled in to carry out therefore? If it wasn’t in a position to replicate the outcome of earlier in the day work, does it demonstrably recognize just what information had been missing/the most likely factors?
  5. Generalizability: Does the paper rise above replicating the outcomes regarding the initial to explore if they may be reproduced an additional environment? Instead, in situations of non-replicability, does the paper talk about the wider implications of this outcome? Continue reading “The share of a reproduction paper is based on analyses of plus in insights into current methods and problems—plus the certainty that is added is sold with validating past outcomes.”